Schools that offer a same-gender classroom structure do not give students an opportunity to work on this essential social skill. While teachers in co-ed schools sometimes beg their students to contribute to class discussion, this is not true in single-sex schools a great deal of the time. Boys tend to soften their competitive edge and become more collaborative in a single-sex setting.
Adult graduates of all-girls high schools and colleges report extreme satisfaction with their education. One of the benefits of coeducation is that boys and girls get to learn in the presence of one another.
The Case for Single-Gender Classrooms Jefferson Leadership Academies was in the spotlight in when it became the first public middle school in the United States to have entirely single-gender classes. For example, a class discussion of Hamlet in a boys' school can involve a study of a boy's coming-of-age and of father-son relationships.
Though the stereotype about boys' schools is that they are rough-and-tumble places in which boys are hazed, the reality is often quite different. All leadership positions are held by girls; all the star athletes are girls; all the academic scholarships go to girls.
She also believes that girls will eventually have to work side-by-side with boys.
That means a school could counter a poor performance in STEM-related categories by creating gender-specific classrooms in this area while still emphasizing co-education in the other fields.
Teachers valued boys' comments more than girls' comments. For example, on the whole, girls and boys who are educated in single-sex schools gain more confidence than their coed peers.
When there are single-gender classrooms in place at a school district, then many of the programs are based on the stereotypes of boys and girls instead of focusing on their actual needs.